German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul has highlighted the close alignment in foreign policy collaboration with his U.S. counterpart, Marco Rubio. In an interview with the “Berlin Playbook” podcast by Politico, Wadephul emphasized a significant degree of agreement on key foreign policy and security matters, particularly concerning Israel, Iran, Ukraine and the broader Middle East peace process. He specifically noted a strong and reliable partnership with Rubio regarding the situation in Ukraine, stating they share a similar perspective on the issue.
Speaking about the transatlantic defense alliance, Wadephul affirmed that NATO is “larger and stronger than ever before” contributing to Germany’s security. However, he cautioned that European nations now bear an increased responsibility, especially given the current stance of certain figures regarding support commitments. Ukraine, he added, is particularly looking towards Germany for assistance.
Wadephul underscored the continued importance of a stable transatlantic security architecture, referencing the recent accession of Sweden and Finland to NATO as foundational for security in Germany. He also expressed support for both the expansion and reform of the European Union, advocating for the inclusion of nations from the Western Balkans as being in the interests of both parties involved.
Regarding his working relationship with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Wadephul described it as exceptionally close and well-coordinated, expressing enthusiasm for their collaboration. He unequivocally affirmed Merz’s authority and decision-making power, emphasizing his own commitment to working within those parameters and being granted considerable autonomy in his own ministerial duties.
The recent, publicly articulated proposal regarding a five percent defense spending target was also confirmed to be internally aligned. Wadephul explained that their actions are based on shared objectives and his initiative served as a catalyst for broader coalition support.
In a clear distinction from his predecessor, Annalena Baerbock, Wadephul diverged on both policy direction and communication style. He expressed reservations concerning a feminist foreign policy approach, suggesting a need to prioritize core objectives given the complexity of the international landscape. Wadephul reiterated his commitment to prioritizing German and European interests, emphasizing freedom, security and prosperity as central goals. He argued that foreign policy must deliver tangible contributions, deeming it unproductive if it fails to do so.
