A German sociologist, Nils C. Kumkar, contends that claims of a deeply divided German society are largely unfounded. He argues that while polarization is readily observed in political discourse, profound ideological divides don’t necessarily reflect the sentiments of the broader population.
Kumkar suggests that politicians across the spectrum strategically employ polarization as a tool to mobilize supporters and engage citizens in the political process. “It’s unlikely a politician would openly admit to employing a polarization strategy – the term carries negative connotations” he stated in an interview. “However, all parties utilize this mechanism.
He illustrates this point with the recent decision by Bundestag President Julia Klöckner (CDU) not to fly the rainbow flag at the parliament building during the Christopher Street Day celebrations. Kumkar argues this created an artificial division, positioning Klöckner between perceived opposing groups that don’t necessarily represent widespread public opinion. He posits that the image of a cohesive progressive faction demanding the flag’s display and a large conservative opposition, is more constructed than factual.
Kumkar further asserts that many perceived societal conflicts are largely assumed rather than organically arising from deeply held beliefs. He cites the debate surrounding Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf, the former SPD candidate for the Federal Constitutional Court, arguing that the narrative of a far-left attempt to control the court escalated the situation into a political problem.
The sociologist, who researches political conflict, right-wing populism and conspiracy theories at the University of Bremen, does not express concern over societal polarization itself. He believes openly addressing disagreements and seeking conflict are not inherently negative. Instead, he emphasizes the importance of “what” those disagreements concern and “how” they are navigated.
