The German government’s current coalition, comprised of the conservative CDU/CSU and the Social Democrats (SPD), faces escalating criticism over its ambiguous policies regarding heating subsidies, a situation one former government official has labelled an “organized work stoppage”. Michael Kellner, formerly a parliamentary secretary at the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action, voiced his concerns in interviews with RTL and ntv on Thursday, highlighting a critical lack of direction emanating from the ministry.
Kellner’s rebuke centers on the inability of the Ministry of Economics and Energy to provide a clear roadmap for future heating subsidies, a failure that has reportedly led to open derision at industry events. The decision by the Coalition Committee to postpone crucial decisions on the matter until next year has been described as “irresponsible” leaving both consumers and businesses in a state of uncertainty and potentially undermining the adoption of climate-friendly heating solutions.
“The ministry cannot articulate its plans” Kellner stated, underlining the palpable frustration within the heating sector. This lack of clarity, he argues, risks disincentivizing investment in technologies like heat pumps, particularly as existing subsidies are poised to shift.
Kellner’s demands for transparency extend beyond the immediate heating subsidies. He argued that public funds are currently being misallocated towards short-term political gains rather than necessary infrastructural improvements such as rail networks, roadways and bridges. “Resources should be directed towards essential infrastructure, not expensive election gifts” he asserted.
The controversy exposes a deeper tension within the governing coalition, potentially reflecting disagreements over priorities and long-term climate strategy. Kellner’s criticisms act as a potent reminder of the importance of consistent policy guidance in fostering sustainable investment and maintaining public confidence in the government’s climate commitments. The situation demands immediate action to clarify the direction of energy policy and prevent further destabilization of the sector.
