Saxony’s Minister President Michael Kretschmer has ignited a debate within German and European political circles with a forceful critique of the European Union’s ambitious climate targets. In an interview with ntv, Kretschmer, a leading figure within the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), argued that the current timelines for achieving climate goals are unrealistic and risk triggering widespread deindustrialization across the bloc.
Kretschmer’s primary concern revolves around the accelerated pace of emission reductions. The EU’s recent agreement to target a 90% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2040, compared to 1990 levels, has prompted his warning that it severely restricts the flexibility needed in sectors like housing, industry and energy. “If we’re aiming for 90% emission reductions by 2040 compared to 1990, we have no room for maneuver in housing, industry and energy” he emphasized.
Beyond the timeline, Kretschmer’s challenge extends to the core mechanisms driving the EU’s climate policy. He specifically called for a re-evaluation of the carbon price, suggesting the current system is unsustainable and hampering critical investment decisions. “The carbon tax cannot function like this” he stated, advocating for adjustments within the emissions trading scheme to provide more “room for maneuver” – a subtle but significant indication that current pricing levels are detrimental to economic viability.
While reaffirming his commitment to climate protection and the overall 2050 climate goals, Kretschmer stressed the importance of affordable and accessible energy. His criticism of the German government’s proposed industrial electricity price – a levy intended to incentivize energy efficiency – highlights a deeper concern regarding the economic consequences of rapid decarbonization. He questioned the viability of the scheme, pointing out the potential for a disconnect between the levy’s cost and escalating network expenses, necessitating continued government subsidies.
The Minister President’s remarks represent a growing tension within the CDU and across the EU, as policymakers grapple with balancing environmental ambition and economic realities. His stance on energy security further reflects the current geopolitical landscape, though he ruled out a return to Russian gas imports for the time being. Kretschmer’s intervention is likely to fuel further debate about the EU’s climate strategy and the potential need for recalibration to ensure a just and sustainable transition.
