In response to the drone incident in Leipzig, SPD domestic policy expert Sebastian Fiedler defended the current structure of security responsibilities at airports against criticism. Speaking to the “Rheinische Post”, Fiedler argued that having different jurisdictions at airports is not inherently problematic, provided that cooperation is close, highly functional, and minimizes friction. He stressed that it must always be unequivocally clear who is responsible for what and when.
This stance contrasted with criticisms leveled by Thomas Röwekamp, chairman of the Defence Committee (CDU). While defending the operational setup, Fiedler also stated that, generally across Germany-and not limited to security agencies-investing in state-of-the-art drone defense technology is absolutely necessary. Furthermore, the SPD politician backed the existing drone defense facilities, noting that having the Drone Defense Center and the Joint Hybrid Defense Center (GAZ Hybrid) currently in operation is a significant asset for security agencies.
Röwekamp had previously called for the implementation of clear national jurisdiction for drone defense, faster decision-making processes, and the provision of modern technical equipment for security bodies. He told the “Rheinische Post” that the current fragmentation of duties failed to address the dynamic nature of this threat.
