Germany Considers "State of Tension" Response to Drone Incursions
Mixed

Germany Considers “State of Tension” Response to Drone Incursions

Following repeated incursions of drones into the airspace of European nations, a leading German security policy expert is advocating for the invocation of a “state of tension” within Germany. Roderich Kiesewetter, a security policy spokesperson for the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), argues this measure is necessary to enable the German armed forces (Bundeswehr) to “immediately counter” drone threats.

Speaking to the Handelsblatt newspaper, Kiesewetter emphasized that this capability should extend beyond military installations, encompassing critical infrastructure. He argued that the distinction between external and internal security is becoming increasingly blurred, particularly in the context of hybrid warfare.

Kiesewetter attributed recent drone activity to what he contends is a deliberate strategy employed by Russia, utilizing the overflights for “military purposes, as part of intelligence gathering” a practice he described as “preparing the battlefield” – a military term referring to pre-operational reconnaissance and disruption. He also highlighted the role of “cognitive warfare” pointing to attempts to sow fear and uncertainty within the population. Consequently, he argues the situation warrants being treated as a potential attack.

The invocation of a “state of tension” would reportedly facilitate the protection of vital infrastructure by the Bundeswehr while simultaneously affording police forces greater options in safeguarding the civilian population. It would also aim to streamline decision-making processes and improve the efficient deployment of resources.

Echoing Kiesewetter’s call, fellow CDU politician Marc Henrichmann stressed the need for expedited decision pathways and clarified responsibilities through new mutual assistance and legal aid frameworks between police and the Bundeswehr. He described the drone threat as “massive” demanding a decisive response, asserting that “an armed combat drone is not a hobby drone”.