SPD Accuses CDU of Weakness in Key Judge Election
Politics

SPD Accuses CDU of Weakness in Key Judge Election

The ongoing debate surrounding the postponed election of judges for Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court has intensified, with differing perspectives emerging from the coalition partners. SPD General Secretary Tim Klüssendorf has publicly questioned the ability of CDU parliamentary group leader Jens Spahn to secure consensus, stating that difficulties in maintaining majorities or finding common ground within the coalition impacts his own party as well.

Klüssendorf acknowledged that the recent events have undoubtedly strained trust within the black-red coalition, referencing a pattern of collaborative decisions being subsequently challenged. He defended the conduct of Cornelia Brosius-Gersdorf following her appearance on the “Markus Lanz” television program, pointing to the significant public scrutiny she has faced and the proliferation of what he described as inaccurate representations of her positions, some originating from within the CDU. He emphasized that individuals subjected to such public attacks have a right to defend themselves.

Demands from the CDU to reconsider the SPD’s nominee for the Constitutional Court have been firmly rejected. Klüssendorf reiterated the SPD’s unwavering support for Brosius-Gersdorf, highlighting her reputation as a highly respected constitutional law scholar and deeming her eminently suitable for the role of judge. He affirmed the SPD’s complete backing for her candidacy.

Regarding comments made by Brosius-Gersdorf during her television appearance, where she suggested withdrawing her candidacy should it precipitate a government crisis or harm the court’s reputation, Klüssendorf dismissed any interpretation of these remarks as an indication of withdrawal. He clarified that her intention was to emphasize her identity as a scientist and not a political operative and that her ability to weigh these perspectives reflects a positive characteristic. He categorically denied that these comments constituted a pre-planned exit strategy.