A growing chorus of concern is challenging the long-term viability of Germany’s “Minijob” system, with a prominent faction within the ruling coalition now advocating for its substantial dismantling. Stefan Nacke, chairman of the parliamentary group representing employee interests within the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), has publicly criticized the widespread reliance on these part-time, low-wage positions, arguing they have devolved into a structural flaw undermining the nation’s social safety net.
Nacke’s critique, articulated in an interview with the Süddeutsche Zeitung, highlights the growing dependence on Minijobs – initially intended as a simplified way to legalize small, occasional tasks – which have morphed into a parallel labor market operating largely outside the established social order. With an estimated six to eight million individuals now employed under these conditions, what was once a fringe phenomenon has become a norm, particularly prevalent in sectors like hospitality, retail and cleaning.
The core appeal of the Minijob system – the “gross equals net” principle, effectively eliminating income tax withholding – is now being characterized as fundamentally unsustainable and socially unjust. Nacke argues this structure shifts the costs associated with social security – covering illness, old age and unemployment – onto the public at large while leaving workers exposed and vulnerable. This, he warns, leads to diminished contributions into crucial social insurance funds and an increased burden on basic welfare programs.
The sheer size and influence of the employee-focused parliamentary group, comprising 62 members-nearly three times the size of the increasingly vocal “Young Group” currently embroiled in a debate concerning pension reform-underscores the potential impact of this challenge to the status quo.
Nacke’s call for reform directly proposes reverting Minijobs to their original, limited purpose: temporary roles for students or retirees, not a substitute for conventional employment. This necessitates clear legislative changes leading to the abolition of Minijobs as a permanent form of employment, accompanied by transitional periods and socially responsible models. The ultimate goal, he asserts, must be to ensure that all workers are adequately protected through fair contributions, robust rights and genuine opportunities for advancement, ultimately moving individuals from precarious Minijob arrangements into standard, socially secure employment. The debate now centers on how swiftly and effectively this transition can be achieved without disrupting the economy.
