Union Plans Risk "Two-Tier" Healthcare System
Mixed

Union Plans Risk “Two-Tier” Healthcare System

A debate has emerged surrounding potential changes to Germany’s healthcare system, with concerns raised about the possibility of a tiered approach. Representatives from The Left party have accused union parties of proposing models that could lead to a “three-tiered” system, potentially limiting access to care for lower-income individuals.

Jan van Aken, co-leader of The Left, voiced his criticism in the “Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung”, arguing that proposals such as reduced benefits or expensive tariffs for patients would undermine the principles of universal healthcare. He stated that such measures would effectively create a situation where those without financial resources would be unable to afford necessary treatment.

Van Aken specifically addressed the proposed introduction of a basic tariff for those insured under the statutory health insurance system. He suggested that this would exacerbate an existing two-tiered system – one involving private and statutory healthcare – by creating a third tier for impoverished individuals. He advocated for a healthcare system guaranteeing equitable and quality care for all citizens.

The proposals stem from concerns over rising healthcare costs, with CDU State Secretary in the Ministry of Health, Tino Sorge, suggesting that healthcare providers consider introducing basic tariffs. These tariffs would be cheaper than existing contributions but would only guarantee a fundamental level of care, with additional services requiring extra payments. Similar proposals have previously been rejected by insurers and social organizations.

In contrast, van Aken proposed an alternative approach: adjusting health insurance contributions based on income. He highlighted the perceived inequity of current system, where a member of parliament, for example, pays a smaller percentage of their income towards healthcare contributions compared to a truck driver. He called for the elimination, or a significant increase, of the contribution assessment limit, believing that the resulting revenue could be used to lower contributions and ensure accessible, quality healthcare for everyone.