Multiple experts reject the notion that an out-of-control artificial intelligence could pose an existential threat to humanity. Elisabeth L’Orange, an entrepreneur, stated during the “ntv Talk Spezial – Die KI-Revolution” that autonomous systems are not capable of acting independently. She primarily points to the current technical limitations of these systems, suggesting that the real dangers arise when humans intentionally deploy AI for harmful purposes, such as making cyberattacks significantly more effective.
Matthias Spielkamp, Managing Director of Algorithm-Watch, shares this skepticism regarding the idea of an AI developing its own will and escaping human control. He dismisses the notion that AI gains consciousness and subsequently breaks free as “complete nonsense.” While acknowledging that AI can cause significant damage, Spielkamp insists that the responsibility for such harm lies squarely with the humans and companies that develop and implement the systems.
Achim Berg, a former Bitkom president, investor, and multi-board supervisor, vehemently refutes warnings about AI causing the extermination of humankind, labeling them “total nonsense” and extremely counterproductive. He identifies a far greater risk: the capacity of artificial intelligence to influence people individually. This influence could become particularly problematic when individuals begin to trust results generated by AI systems without being able to understand how those systems arrived at their conclusions.
Wolf-Dieter Adlhoch, CEO of the Dussmann Group, also sees the immediate threat originating from human action. He considers the risk today to be greater that humans will use AI deliberately to cause harm. Consequently, both companies and society must confront these specific risks while continuing to recognize the technological opportunities that AI presents.
