Federal Transport Minister Steffen Bilger (CDU) has criticized Deutsche Bahn regarding issues in the rail network’s renovation, specifically citing the Berlin-Hamburg route. Speaking to Spiegel, Bilger stated he is “not at all satisfied” with the current execution of corridor renovations-which involve modernizing tracks, switches, and rail and safety technology. He questioned how one could explain to commuters why travel routes remain blocked for so long yet the situation still shows no significant improvement. Consequently, he is actively meeting with all relevant parties to form his own opinion.
In a separate matter, Bilger welcomed the plans of the Italian rail provider Italo to offer services in Germany. While noting he had never ridden with Italo and thus not tried their espresso, the minister emphasized that “competition brings advantages to rail customers.” He added that while Deutsche Bahn operates in European countries, it must acknowledge Italian competitors. However, he cautioned that new routes between major cities, like those planned by Italo, should not result in fewer connections to smaller towns or place undue strain on the existing network.
Regarding investment, Bilger asserted that the special fund provides a strong foundation for modernizing the country. “Infrastructure is expensive. But we have more money available for it than ever before, thanks to the special fund,” he said. He pointed out that the past struggle was not solely financial. “We were far too slow in planning; the processes were drawn out, and projects were often criticized. There were also doubts about whether the necessary funds would be available long-term,” the CDU politician continued. He stressed that the current investments should demonstrate they are substantial and not “just a flash in the pan.”
Bilger also addressed the impact of construction work on travelers, acknowledging that drivers, train riders, and air travelers all hope to arrive punctually. He admitted that construction sites inevitably lead to more delays, but labeled them a “necessary evil” to ensure the infrastructure is improved afterward.
Finally, on the subject of highways, Bilger believes that speed limits are unnecessary. He argued that a speed limit would change little on major motorways, as most drivers already prefer to cruise comfortably using cruise control instead of pushing 220 kilometers per hour. Furthermore, some drive slower deliberately due to high fuel costs. He stated that while the discussion surrounding this topic is highly emotional, a speed limit would “anger many people and bring only a small climate protection effect.”
